課程資訊
課程名稱
 歐盟與國際政治專題
Seminar on Eu and World Politics 
開課學期
 101-2 
授課對象
 社會科學院  政治學研究所  
授課教師
 蘇宏達 
課號
 PS7592 
課程識別碼
 322 M5120 
班次
  
學分
 2 
全/半年
 半年 
必/選修
 選修 
上課時間
 星期四3,4(10:20~12:10) 
上課地點
 社科研3 
備註
 國際關係。
限學士班三年級以上
總人數上限：20人
外系人數限制：5人 
Ceiba 課程網頁
 http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1012EU 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
 核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

本課程是以解析歐洲聯盟的對外政策和對國際政治的影響為主要內容。 

課程目標
 本課程目標是透過對歐洲聯盟對外政策的解析，讓學生瞭解二次大戰後歐洲如何透過此區域統合達成和解共生、共存共榮的目標，並在國際政治中發揮影響力。 
課程要求
 課堂出席,參與討論,心得摘要 Performance in class 30％
期中報告 mid-term examination 20％
期末報告 final examination 50％


上課方式：

一， Overview of debate in last class and current development of the EU in world politics (Professor Su, 20 mn)

二， Reporter of the subject (assigned students, 20 mn)

三， Discussants (assigned students, 20 mn)

四， Q & A (40 mn)
 
預期每週課後學習時數
  
Office Hours
 每週一 14:00~16:00 備註： 請於課堂預約 
指定閱讀
 Main reference A

1. 蘇老師主編，歐盟聯盟的歷史發展與理論辯論，2011.
2. 李貴英主編，歐洲聯盟經貿專論，2011.
3. 洪德欽主編，歐盟憲法，2007.
4. 黃偉峰主編，歐洲聯盟組織與運作，二版，2007.
5. 張亞中主編，歐盟全球戰略與對外關係, 2006.
8. 蔡政文 (編)，《當今歐盟-中國-台灣關火的演變與未來》，頁269304。台北：遠景基金會。

Main reference B
1. Su (2012). “A Historical and Academic Review of EU Studies in Taiwan”, in Jose E. Borao Mateo and vassilis Vagios eds., Interfaces: EU Studies and European Languages Programs in East Asia, Taipei: NTU Press, pp. 3-32.
2. Su（2012）「檢視歐洲聯盟共同外交暨安全政策運作共同體化的可能性」，歐洲研究，30卷175期，頁54-65。
3. Su (2010), “The EU’s Taiwan Policy in a New Context”, Issues and Studies, 46(1), March, pp. 1-54.
4. Su (2009), “Jean Monnet’s Great Design for Europe and its Criticism”, Journal of European Integration History, (15), pp. 29-46.
5. 蘇宏達（2009）。〈解析里斯本條約對歐盟對外行動能力與民主治理機制可能的影響〉，《政治科學論叢》40: 81-126。（TSSCI）

11. Su, H. (蘇宏達) (2007). Politics of differentiation: enhanced cooperation in the EU and the pathfinder in APEC. Asia Europe Journal, 5:51-66.
14. Su, H. (2004, December). Can the constitution-building advance the European Integration? A three-pillared institutionalist analysis. Journal of European Integration, 26, 4: 353-378.
16. 蘇宏達（2003）。〈論網路資源在台灣歐盟研究中的角色〉，《問題與研究》，42, 5: 81-113。（TSSCI）
21. 蘇宏達，民90年3-4月，〈歐盟經驗與兩岸統合：建立WTO架構下的雙邊商務糾紛解決機制〉，《問題與研究》，第40卷第2期，頁1-32。(TSSCI)

Main Reference C
21. Mark Baimbridge,Briab Burkitt and Philip B. Whyman, The Eurozone as a Flawed Currency Area, The Political Quarterly, 2012, Vol. 83, No. 1, pp. 96-107.
22. George KYRIS, The European Union and the Cyprus problem: a story of limited impetus, Eastern Journal of European Studies, 2012, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp.87-99.
25. Steven C. Bennett, The "Right to Be Forgotten": Reconciling EU and US Perspectives, Berkeley Journal of International law, 2012, Vol. 30:1, pp.161-195.
26. Jan-Werner Muller, Europe’s Perfect Storm The Political and Economic Consequences of the Eurocrisis, Dissent, 2012, Fall, pp.47-53.
27. Carolina B. Pavese and Dia rmuid Torney, The contribution of the European Union to global climate change governance: explaining the conditions for EU actorness, Rev. Bras. Polít. Int. 2012. 55 (special edition), pp.125-143.
31. Alexander Sergunin, Towards an EU-Russia Common Space on External Security: Prospects for Cooperation, Research Journal of International Studies, 2012, Issue 24, pp.18-34.

 
參考書目
 Main reference A

1. 蘇老師主編，歐盟聯盟的歷史發展與理論辯論，2011.
2. 李貴英主編，歐洲聯盟經貿專論，2011.
3. 洪德欽主編，歐盟憲法，2007.
4. 黃偉峰主編，歐洲聯盟組織與運作，二版，2007.
5. 張亞中主編，歐盟全球戰略與對外關係, 2006.
6. Hellen Wallace et al eds., Policy Making in the EU, Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 2010.
7. Andrew Moravscik, The Choice for Europe, 1998.
8. 蔡政文 (編)，《當今歐盟-中國-台灣關火的演變與未來》，頁269304。台北：
遠景基金會。
9. Tony Judt, Postwar: A History of Europe since 1945, Vol. 1-4, New
York: Penguin Books, 2005.

Main reference B
1. Su (2012). “A Historical and Academic Review of EU Studies in
Taiwan”, in Jose E. Borao Mateo and vassilis Vagios eds., Interfaces: EU
Studies and European Languages Programs in East Asia, Taipei: NTU Press, pp. 3-
32.
2. Su（2012）「檢視歐洲聯盟共同外交暨安全政策運作共同體化的可能性」，歐洲
研究，30卷175期，頁54-65。
3. Su (2010), “The EU’s Taiwan Policy in a New Context”, Issues and
Studies, 46(1), March, pp. 1-54.
4. Su (2009), “Jean Monnet’s Great Design for Europe and its
Criticism”, Journal of European Integration History, (15), pp. 29-46.
5. 蘇宏達（2009）。〈解析里斯本條約對歐盟對外行動能力與民主治理機制可能的
影響〉，《政治科學論叢》40: 81-126。（TSSCI）
6. 蘇宏達（2009）。〈從自由政府間主義解析里斯本條約的發展過程〉，《問題與
研究》。（TSSCI）
7. Su, H. (2008), Asian Perception of Europe-Building in World Politics,
in Michael Gehler ed., From Common Market to European Union Building. 50 Years
of the Rome Treaties 1957-2007, Vienna and Cologne: Boelau, 2008, pp. 663-686.
（peer reviewed）
8. 蘇宏達（2008）。〈論歐洲聯盟的台海政策〉，蔡政文 (編)，《當今歐盟-中
國-台灣關火的演變與未來》，頁269304。台北：遠景基金會。（TSSCI期刊審查制）
9. Su, H. (蘇宏達) (2007). The father of Europe in China: Jean Monnet
and the creation of CDFC. Journal of European Integration History, 13, 1:9-24.
10. 蘇宏達（2007）。〈論歐洲憲法的優位性〉，《歐美研究》，37, 2: 323-389。
（TSSCI）
11. Su, H. (蘇宏達) (2007). Politics of differentiation: enhanced
cooperation in the EU and the pathfinder in APEC. Asia Europe Journal, 5:51-66.
12. Su, H. (蘇宏達) (2005). The dynamics of widening on the deepening of
the European Union: The consitutiotnalization of enhanced cooperation.
EurAmerica (歐美研究), 35, 3: 501-545。（TSSCI）
13. 蘇宏達（2004）。〈從制度主義解析歐洲聯盟憲法條約草案〉，《政治科學論
叢》，20: 167-208。（TSSCI）
14. Su, H. (2004, December). Can the constitution-building advance the
European Integration? A three-pillared institutionalist analysis. Journal of
European Integration, 26, 4: 353-378.
15. Su, H. (2004, décembre). Les Etats-Unis et Taïwan vis-à-vis de la
Nouvelle Politique Chinoise de la France. Revue d’Histoire Diplômatique, 4:
369-406.
16. 蘇宏達（2003）。〈論網路資源在台灣歐盟研究中的角色〉，《問題與研究》，
42, 5: 81-113。（TSSCI）
17. 蘇宏達（2002）。〈以「歷史機制論」解析歐盟憲法倡議與憲政秩序建立間的競
合〉，《理論與政策》，16, 2: 1-25。（TSSCI觀察名單）
18. Su, H. (2005, March). Asian perspective of constitutional reform
processes. In M. Gehler, G. Bischof, L. Kühnhardt and R. Steiniger (Eds.),
Towards a European constitution: A historical and political comparison with
the United States (443-454). Vienna and Cologne: Boehlau Publisher. (peer
reviewed)
19. 蘇宏達 (2003)。〈歐盟理事會的機制與運作〉，黃偉峰 (編)，《歐洲聯盟的組
織與運作》，頁147-198。台北：五南。（TSSCI期刊審查制）
20. 蘇宏達，民國90年12月，〈以「憲政主權」概念解釋歐洲統合之發展〉，《歐美
研究》，第31卷第4期，頁629-687。(TSSCI)
21. 蘇宏達，民90年3-4月，〈歐盟經驗與兩岸統合：建立WTO架構下的雙邊商務糾紛
解決機制〉，《問題與研究》，第40卷第2期，頁1-32。(TSSCI)


Main Reference C

1. Peter Anderson and Georg Wiessala eds., The EU and Asia, 2007
2. Burley, A. M. and Mattli, W. (1993). “Europe Before the Court: A
Political Theory of Legal Integration”, International Organizations, 47, 1:
41-76.
3. Catherine Li (李貴英, 2004, April). “The Direct Effect of the
GATT/WTO Rules within the European Community System: The Position of the Court
of Justice of the European Communities and the Tribunal of First Instance”, 政
大法學評論，78: 209-266。
4. Craig, P. (1996). EC Law, Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
5. Marise Cremona and Bruno de Witte, EU Foreign Relations Law, London,
Hart Publishing Ltd., 2008;
6. Alan Dashwood and Marc Maresceau, Law and Practice of EU External
Relations: Salient Features of a Changing Landscape, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2008.
7. Dell, E., The Schuman Plan and the British Abdication of Leadership
in Europe, Oxford: OUP, 1995.
8. Evans, A. (2003, January). “Regional Dimensions to European
Governance”, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 52, 1: 28-30.
9. Garret, G. (1995). “The Politics of Legal Integration in the
European Union”, International Organizations, 49, 1: 171-181.
10. Gerbet, P. (1983). La Construction Européenne, Paris: Imprimerie
nationale.
11. F. Laursen ed., Comparative Regional Integration: Theoretical
Perspectives, Aldershot (UK): Ashgate, 2003.
12. Mattli, W. (1999). The Logic of Regional Integration: Europe and
Beyond. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
13. Pierson, P. (1996), “The Path to European Integration: A Historical
Institutional Analysis”, Comparative Political Studies, 29, 2: 123-163.
14. Schübel, I. (1997, November). “La Primauté du Droit Communautaire en
Allemagne”, Revue du Marché Commun et de l’Union Européenne, 412: 621-629.
15. Schwarze, J. (2000). (Ed.), The Birth of a European Constitutional
Order, Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
16. Weiler, J. (2001). “Epilogue: The Judicial Après Nice”, in G. de
Búrca and J. Weiler (Eds.), The European Court of Justice, Oxford, UK: Oxford
University Press, pp. 215-226.
17. Etain Tannam, The European Union and Conflict Resolution: Northern
Ireland, Cyprus and Bilateral Cooperation, Government and Opposition, 2012,
Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 49–73.
18. Elizabeth F. Defeis, THE TREATY OF LISBON AND ACCESSION OF THE
EUROPEAN UNION TO THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS. ILSA Journal of
Intemational & Comparative Law, 2012, Vol. 18:2, pp. 387-394.
19. Valery Konyshev and Aleksandr Sergunin, The Arctic at the Crossroads
of Geopolitical Interests, Russian Politics and Law, 2012, vol. 50, no. 2, pp.
34–54.
20. Utku Özer* - Seniye Gül Yıldırımkaya, The Turkish Identity: A Part of
European Identity or an Eternal Other?, International Journal of Turcologia,
2012, Vol: VII No: 14, pp.31-43.
21. Mark Baimbridge,Briab Burkitt and Philip B. Whyman, The Eurozone as a
Flawed Currency Area, The Political Quarterly, 2012, Vol. 83, No. 1, pp. 96-
107.
22. George KYRIS, The European Union and the Cyprus problem: a story of
limited impetus, Eastern Journal of European Studies, 2012, Volume 3, Issue 1,
pp.87-99.
23. Inga Daukšienė, Sigita Matijošaitytė, The Role of National
Parliaments in the European Union after treaty of lisbon, Jurisprudence. 2012,
19(1), pp. 31–47.
24. Ramon Pacheco Pardo, EU membership and the Europeanization of Spanish
political parties, International Journal of Iberian Studies, 2012, Volume 25
Number 1, pp. 3-19.
25. Steven C. Bennett, The "Right to Be Forgotten": Reconciling EU and US
Perspectives, Berkeley Journal of International law, 2012, Vol. 30:1, pp.161-
195.
26. Jan-Werner Muller, Europe’s Perfect Storm The Political and Economic
Consequences of the Eurocrisis, Dissent, 2012, Fall, pp.47-53.
27. Carolina B. Pavese and Dia rmuid Torney, The contribution of the
European Union to global climate change governance: explaining the conditions
for EU actorness, Rev. Bras. Polít. Int. 2012. 55 (special edition), pp.125-
143.
28. Brendan Simms, Towards a mighty union: how to create a democratic
European superpower, International Affairs, 2012, 88: 1, pp.49-62.
29. Agnė Vaitkevičiūtė, The Relationship between member state liability
in damages for breach of the European Union law and state responsibility for
breach of International law, Jurisprudence. 2012, 19(1): pp. 71–86.
30. Güneş Ayas, Dilemmas of Eurasianism as an Alternative Policy for
Turkey, International Journal of Turcologia, 2012, Vol: VII No: 14, pp. 45-61.
31. Alexander Sergunin, Towards an EU-Russia Common Space on External
Security: Prospects for Cooperation, Research Journal of International
Studies, 2012, Issue 24, pp.18-34.


Recommended journals：

- Journal of Common Market Studies
- Journal of European Integration
- Journal of European Integration History
- Journal of European Public Policy
- Asia Europe Journal
- European Law Review
 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
  
No.
項目
百分比
說明
1. 
 平時(出席,討論,心得摘要) 
30% 
  
2. 
 期末報告 
50% 
  
3. 
 期中報告 
20% 
  
 
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第1週
 2/21  Introduction 
第2週
 2/28  day off 
第3週
 3/7  EU History and Integration Theory I: 1950-1990 指定閱讀:A1 pp. 1-148 輔助閱讀:A7, A9
 
第4週
 3/14  EU History and Integration Theory II: 1990-2010 指定閱讀:A1 pp. 149-342 輔助閱讀:A7, A9 
第5週
 3/21  Methodology of EU Studies 指定閱讀: B1, A4 pp. 79-106 
第6週
 3/28  EU Institutions: European Council, Council and Commission 指定閱讀: A4 pp. 107-280 
第7週
 4/4  day off 
第8週
 4/11  EU Institutions and Law: Parliament, ECJ and EU Law 指定閱讀: A4 pp. 281-414 A3 pp. 13-80 輔助閱讀: C18, 23, 29
A3 pp. 13-80, 121-184, 295-332
A 2 pp. 419-473. 
第9週
 4/18  Midterm Report (期中考週) 
第10週
 4/25  CFSP 指定閱讀: B 2, 4, 5, 11, 14;
C 22, 27 輔助閱讀: A 6 pp. 431-456
C 20, 30, 31 
第11週
 5/2  EU in World Politics I 指定閱讀: A5, pp. 1-136 輔助閱讀: C 28 C 25, C 31 
第12週
 5/9  Speech: Euro Crisis 指定閱讀: C 21, 26 
第13週
 5/16  EU in World Politics II 指定閱讀: A5, pp. 136-274 輔助閱讀: C 19, 25 C 25, 31 
第14週
 5/23  EU-China/Taiwan Relations 指定閱讀: A 8 pp. 91-304 輔助閱讀: B 9 B 3, 21 
第15週
 5/30  by Dr SU 
第16週
 6/6  EU - NATO Speech by Dr. Chen  
第17週
 6/13  Final Report I 口頭+紙本報告 
第18週
 6/20  Final Report II 發還紙本報告及討論